Still, Stacy McCain's post here is the definitive one.
Update: Rigel Kent at Blogfodder comments on some of the commenters on Stacy's site:
One of them wanted to know why Sarah Palin hasn't "proven" the child's hers. Now assuming she hasn't, (and for all I know she might have-I haven't followed the whole Truther nonsense very closely-and the Truthers are just ignoring it) my answer would be, she doesn't have to. And has very little reason to do so.- JP
You see what these nitwits fail to realize is that when you accuse someone of something, the burden of proof is on you to prove the accusation accurate, not on the accused to prove it inaccurate. Add to that the fact that the only people who give this "Truther" crap even the slightest credence are loony nut-jobs who were never going to support her for anything regardless, and why should she bother?
No comments:
Post a Comment