"Liberal logic" does not compute

Palindemocrat isn't the first person to discover that what passes for liberal logic does not compute:

Take Bill Maher. (Please). In a recent Larry King live interview, he informed us that Sarah Palin might be elected President someday, because we are a stupid country. Now here’s what I don’t understand. If we were a stupid country when George W. Bush was re-elected in 2004, and we’re a stupid country now because Sarah Palin might be elected in the future, were we also a stupid country on Nov. 4th, 2008? Did we stop off in the Reality Based Community to vote, while we were on our way from Jesusland to Cracker Nation?

In one particularly ludicrous display of the limberness of liberal logic, Joan Walsh seems to be trying to make the case that Obama has lost almost one third of his white support because they were either too stupid to know that Obama was a black man when they voted for him, or they were too stupid to know that they were racists and weren’t supposed to vote for a black man. Or something. I’m not sure what point she was trying to make, or if she was even trying to make one, other than to remind us that anyone and everyone who doesn’t worship at the altar of Obama is a stupid racist.

(Visual of the robot from "Lost in Space" banging itself against a rock and repeating, "Non sequitur!", "Non sequitur!", "Non sequitur!"...)

We can't explain it either. The liberal brain is wired so differently from those of us lesser beings that it defies common sense. But it makes them feel superior, and that's all that counts in their alternate universe.

- JP