Andrew Sullivan thinks he has a knock down argument against social conservatives. So what is this terrible and horrifying thing of which social conservatives are guilty? He argues that statistics show that more fundamentalist teens give birth. Horrors! Don't those mothers have the decency to take their daughters to the abortionist and then get them on the pill like upper middle class liberal mothers do?If that's all there were to it, we would have the table set for a good debate. But Sullivan bends the rules. According to Patterico (Warning: some discussion after the jump is not family-friendly):
Continuing his pathological Sarah Palin obsession... Sullivan is so caught up in glorious raptures over the culture of death that he thinks that promiscuous, sterile sex and abortion are preferable to the struggle of parenting. And his charge against us social conservatives is that we presume to disagree with him. This is pathetic, to put it mildly. I'm afraid he will have to come up with something a lot worse than giving birth to a new, unique, human being made in the image of God to hurl as an accusation against social conservatives to prove how evil we are. If that is our worst fault, we are not doing too badly, all things considered, especially considering the alternatives.
When Sullivan’s penchant for seeking cheap sex from strangers was revealed, he pontificated that it was proper to ignore the controversy:The Left and their double standards. So much for intellectually honest debate...The truth is: no-one’s legal, consensual, adult private life should be plundered and exposed for political purposes.But when it came to Sarah Palin’s son, Sullivan was only to happy to press Palin to answer a story presented anonymously, the only salient details of which were untrue. Did Sullivan think Palin should answer? Naturally, that was different:
I ignored the requests for comment because there was nothing to comment on... I was asked to confirm a story presented anonymously, the only salient details of which I believed to be untrue. Why should I answer?Why not kill this rumor with Palin’s medical records? A 43 year old woman’s pregnancy with a Downs Syndrome child would have been intensely monitored, and the records must be a mile long. Just release them, ok?One standard for me, another for thee. If there is any point on which Sullivan is consistent, that is it.
- JP
No comments:
Post a Comment