Thursday, November 5, 2009

Homegrown Analysis: Sarah Palin and NY-23 in Perspective

- By Ian Ransom

Post-election analysis of the NY 23 race is now speeding like an avalanche from every peak of concerned punditry, but that packed powder isn’t cascading from one of the district’s Adirondack mountain aeries. Perhaps I can hurl a relevant snowball, or two. I was actually born and raised in NY 23. Virtually everyone in my family still resides there. It’s an underestimated, overlooked, and far-too-easily dismissed frontier, which may have been one of the reasons Sarah Palin felt enough kinship with the region to offer moral, financial and political support via her endorsement of Hoffman. I have little doubt that she did her homework before putting her oar in. NY 23 is a hinterland that, in many ways, might’ve easily reminded Sarah of her own beloved Alaska.

NY 23 has always been an icy and isolated bastion of conservatism in a terrifyingly complicated liberal state that often seems to enjoy forgetting the district’s existence. When, as an adult, I would tell friends in New York City that I hailed from “upstate New York,” the response was invariably: “Oh. You’re from Albany?” No. We lived in a place far removed from such “southerly” climes. The border of Quebec is only twelve miles from the Franklin County town in which I was born. Trees outnumbered humans by about 5,000-to-1. So did cows, for that matter. But if anyone thinks NY 23 is some negligible corner of the world, think again.

NY 23 is far more complicated (and consequential) than it’s ever been given credit for. This recent race is partial proof of that, but the real evidence is found in its steadfastly conservative people -- a unique mix of hard-working business owners, factory workers, remnant farmers, and military families who endure unforgiving winters with stiff upper lips -- people who play things pretty close to the vest because that’s how one survives in tough elemental conditions. Outsiders are not rebuffed, but they can be regarded with a dose of deserved skepticism. That’s because outsiders often look with condescension upon locals, even as these “visitors” extol the breathtaking panorama of the Adirondack Mountains, lakes and other rural idylls.

There were unquestionably some in NY-23 who ignored and resented the publicity generated by outside forces in this recent congressional race. People in the district, at least from my experience, are stern but common-sensible people not interested in being guinea-pigs for national experiments in ideology. They are people who want to know, specifically, what their representatives are going to do to keep their remaining farms out of bankers’ clutches, their military base at Fort Drum open for business, their heating oil inexpensive, and their ungodly NY State taxes from ultimately overwhelming them. They also must contend with some of the highest rates of ACORN-style “generational welfare” in the North. Every nose-to-the-grindstone conservative in the district has been faced with galling percentages of people who have been on the dole for decades. The juxtaposition (and the cost in tax-dollars) is jarring, and this is one of several reasons the district has remained in Republican hands against all odds. With the district’s economic horrors amplified over the past three decades via the farming collapse, and recent downturns pushing matters to the very brink of ruin, conservative voters were already beginning to split before Palin or anyone else turned an eye to the region.

Fred Thompson and Sarah Palin rendered valuable service by bringing attention to the guaranteed catastrophe represented by Dede Scozzafava -- Dede the Ultimate Destruction. They exposed this RINO and sent her scurrying back to the Beltway Big Game Reserve where she belongs. It is my opinion, however, that Doug Hoffman and his team, even before possessing the ideological approbation of power-hitters like Palin, spent perhaps too much energy surfing the broader ideological wave and not enough addressing the very specific needs of a constituency known for rejecting any attempts to jump on big conceptual bandwagons. A close look at his campaign seems to bear this out. Conservative voters in NY 23 are some of the most issue-informed in the nation because their survival has depended upon it for decades —- not just since this latest crisis. They’re not a bunch of hicks, and they know far more than liberals were trying to lead the nation to believe (even as they shuttled “Plugs” Biden into Watertown, just for good measure).

As I noted, the rest of NY State tends to forget NY-23 exists and, thus, “North Country” voters have no time for concepts; they want sensible, specific conclusions. But things must play out, once any worthy game has begun. The board had already been too shaken-up, and conservative allegiances rendered to Scozzafava and Hoffman would have split the vote enough for Owens to win no matter what (or who) decided to become involved at the last minute. By helping voters in NY-23 oust the real, long-term danger to the district (Scozzafava), Americans like Palin and Thompson have helped a complex constituency in particular crisis win a key battle that, when it next counts, will help them handily win the war. This race —- and Sarah Palin’s decidedly subtle victory for real conservatism here —- need to be kept in perspective.

- Ian

5 comments:

  1. Just as an added note to my post: If anything, what just happened in NY 23 was (in many respects) a microcosm of what's troubling the entire GOP, a miniature of the national dilemma. The Dems were counting on this very thing. We (and they) know there's a major disconnect between those currently chosen to lead the GOP and bewteen conservatives who have become tired of this disconnect. However, the fracture in leadership is trickling down to the polls: millions are caught between whether to identify primarily as "conservative" at this point, or to identify primarily as "Republican." As a result, we witness fracturing that splits conservative votes especially when a third party conservative candidate is involved. This fact alone made an Owens victory already a guarantee in NY 23.

    In certain places currently undergoing very particular crises-within-crises--like NY 23--the GOP's ideological problems are especially showcased. Thus, a very public example could be made by essentially choosing a vulnerable (and erstwhile "unimportant") district, as Obama and his cohorts unquestionably did with the drafting of McHugh. It was a political set-up. Sneaky but smart, on the part of the Dems. Neither was it a coincidence that major players like Fred Thompson and Sarah Palin turned their attention to this typically overlooked constituency.

    Now, Nancy Pelosi is crowing about their "win" in NY 23, when they knew it was in the bag all along, and what ~we~ are faced with is basically a replay of what Sarah did for John McCain. Obama was going to win handily in '08, but Sarah made tings very interesting and kept longterm conservative hopes alive. Owens was going to win strong in allegiance-fractured NY 23, but Fred (and especially Sarah) made him sweat for it while paving the way for a reclamation in 2010.

    Don't let the media get you down, friends. Wheels within wheels.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of my comparisons:

    Compare Doug Hoffman campaigning to Sarah campaigning in the native village which was suffering from high fuel prices and a bad fishing season.

    I haven't seen Hoffman in action, but sense that he would benefit from watching the video of Sarah talking to the people, listening, explaining, encouraging, knowing their problems, helping as she could, and explaining when she couldn't, and maybe a hug or two.

    Every candidate, or potential candidate, should watch every video of Sarah in action. Watch and learn. Let some of it rub off.

    And every one should hang out in person, watching Sarah at book signings and such. Watching and learning.

    Every politician would benefit from learning from Sarah.

    Every human, too.

    Watch and learn.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This seat being held by a Democrat for the first time since the Civil War is a LIE. Actually, this seat was held by Democrat Rep Michael McNulty from 1989-1993. Before that Democrat Rep Samuel Stratton held the seat from 1983-1989. Before that Dem Rep Peter Peyer from 1979-1983. The last 2 Reps for the 23rd districts were Republicans, Sherwood Boehlert & John McHugh both RHINOs. SO this district is real moderate, blue dog if you like. So for Hoffman to as well as he did is remarkable & is an indication of a massive conservative grassroots movement building.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NY-23

    ReplyDelete
  4. She certainly teaches a lesson in being genuine and without affectation. A rarity in many ways.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is indeed an enormous conservative/Republican stronghold, one which is offset by a firmly entrenched welfare constituency (and the Democrats who help keep this demographic on the dole), as well as a union presence that has changed with the fluctuating fortunes of the various industries in the district (ALCOA, state prison systems, a number of obviously liberal universities, etc.) The mixture is relatively pronounced/polarized, with the difference being that NY 23's Republican constituency has traditionally prevailed...with a few exceptions. It's important to note, as well, that there is a very politically active, prominent and enthusiastic gun-culture throughout, but especially in the northernmost counties. This culture dates back through three centuries of hunting and trade in the region along the Canadian border. My dad is an avid collector, and we were all raised with an awareness of and respect for arms and the right to bear them, etc. It's a unique area, considering that it is indeed part of uber-liberal New York State.

    Funny (and typically), as a youth one couldn't wait to get away from "The Woods," but one also comes to appreciate its history and people with age. I used to poke fun at my conservative parents--not anymore. The area (like many) is going through crucial birth pangs of a recalibrated grassroots movement that will be truly conservative and reclaim the GOP. My opinion.

    ReplyDelete