Chris Cillizza:
"After this week, it's impossible to argue about Palin's influence within the party. She can draw big crowds, sell tons of books and command the biggest media stages -- it doesn't get much bigger than 'Oprah' and Barbara Walters. Whether they admit it or not, every establishment Republican wonders regularly about what Palin has planned for 2010 and 2012 and worries about what impact what she will do has on the party. We dubbed Palin the 'prime mover' in Republican party politics many moons ago -- she acts, others react -- and we are sticking by it."- JP
This guy Cillizza is a clown- he wrote a column last December titled "Ten Republicans to watch for 2012"- and LEFT PALIN OFF IT! He explained that the party grandees didn't hold her in high esteem... and you should have seen some of the longshots he had on that list- what a joke.
ReplyDeleteThis year he favors titles like "Is Palin A 2012 Contender or Pretender?"- it's still a subtle bashing, because he's a squish or even an undercover "progressive" like Andrew Sullivan- why not? The NYT has Brooks... these guys are actually tools and enablers of Obama's destruction of this country- and may be getting something on the side from the Chicago hoods that run this country... note Brooks' off-the-record meeting with Obama two weeks ago.
Now you see this spineless Cillizza- who knows enough to leave himself an out- acknowledging Palin's massive appeal... and it seems like his old column condemning her as irrelevent has been scrubbed from the archive... isn't that special?
I sure don't trust him or his 'paper... and the agenda of their new "conservative" blogger Cillizza -who they hired right after Obama got elected- smells like trash-truck juice.