Friday, April 23, 2010

Why Rand Paul trumps Trey Grayson for Reagan conservatives

*
John Hawkins explains, from his Briefing on the key GOP Senate primaries at Right Wing News:
Grayson voted for Bill Clinton in 1992, trashed Sarah Palin publicly as being unqualified to be President, he's run a sleazy campaign, and he's Mitch McConnell's protege, which I find worrisome. Rand Paul, who is Ron Paul's son, is not a perfect candidate either. Although he's not as much of a Libertarian as his father, he's generally terrible on foreign policy issues and probably isn't quite as good a candidate as Grayson (the Paulites will make sure he is flush with cash at least), but either of them should be favored in what will likely be a competitive Senate race. On the other hand, Paul is ferociously dedicated to shrinking government and cutting spending, which isn't Trey Grayson's strong suit. At the end of the day, both Grayson and Paul are imperfect, but respectable choices for the Senate. Paul's just plain old better where it matters most though, on spending and small government issues.
Federalism rules! Read Hawkins' complete GOP Senate primaries briefing here.

- JP

2 comments:

  1. -Rand Paul

    I believe that the primary Constitutional function of the federal government is national defense, bar none.

    I believe our greatest national security threat is our lack of security at the border. On 9/11, 16 of 19 hijackers were here on ‘legal’ student Visas but were not in school or in the states they were supposed to be in.

    Ten years later we are still not policing who we grant Visas to. We gave a Visa to a Nigerian who had made two trips to Yemen, bought a one way ticket with cash and no baggage and his dad tipped off the US Embassy that he had been radicalized.

    I propose a moratorium on Visas from about ten rogue nations or anybody that has traveled to those nations. I would keep this in place until our government proves they can manage intelligently our Visa process.

    I believe we try the terrorists captured on the battlefield in military tribunals at GITMO. I do not believe in trying them in civilian court.

    I believe that when we must fight, we declare war as the Constitution mandates and we fight to win. That we fight only under US Commander and not the UN.

    I believe that defending this country is the primary and most important Constitutional function of our federal government.

    http://www.randpaul2010.com/issues/h-p/national-defense/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very good post. Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete