Showing posts with label mitt romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mitt romney. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Quick Hits....


Although the results of the Iowa Caucuses were released hours after completion, the certification process continues. As of Monday afternoon, Santorum leads by 80 votes.

Last night was "Newt's best debate" so far.

Romney still won't commit to releasing tax returns.

What's up with that, anyway?

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Quote of the Day (October 20, 2011)

Mitt Romney is not inevitable
*
Michael A. Walsh, at the New York Post:
“And there’s always the possibly that one of the ‘out’ candidates -- Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, Rep. Paul Ryan, even Sarah Palin -- steps back into the ring, electrifying the anti-Mitt crowd.”
- JP

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Quote of the Day (September 11, 2011)

Palin, Romney React to Perry's Calling Social Security a ‘Ponzi Scheme’
*
Mark Whittington, at Yahoo! News:
“Romney clearly thinks that Perry is vulnerable on Social Security and has decided to attack him on it. The problem is that should Perry win the Republican nomination anyway, Romney's words are going to be used against Perry by the Obama administration, much like George H. W. Bush's ‘voodoo economics’ was used against Ronald Reagan's tax cut proposal in 1980. Palin is playing a far more subtle game...”
- JP

Monday, June 13, 2011

SarahPAC tops Romney's PAC in Ohio fundraising

Sarah Palin has collected $58K in the state while Mitt Romney has received $50K.
*
With the first presidential primaries still more than half a year away, Ohioans have nevertheless donated $58,000 to SarahPAC,Gov. Palin's political action committe, and $50,000 to Mitt Romney's Free and Strong America PAC, according to Jessica Wehrman of the Middletown Journal's Washington Bureau:
Ohio, long a bellwether in presidential politics, isn’t necessarily considered a must-win for Republican primary candidates.

But the enthusiasm a candidate musters in the Buckeye state — including financial contributions — can be indicative of how they’ll do in the general election.

“Ohio’s always going to be a focus of presidential elections,” said Dave Levinthal, a spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics, which collects and analyzes data about political fundraising. “If one candidate is doing particularly well there, that could to some degree foreshadow their success later.”

Ohio money is important, too.

Before presidential candidates launch formal campaigns, they raise money through leadership PACs — political action committees that politicians use for indirect sponsoring of a candidacy. The funds can be used for travel, political consulting fees or polling.

Levinthal calls those PACs a “barometer” of early support.

Later, Ohio can be expected to be a significant donor to campaign coffers.

In 2008, presidential campaign donations from Ohio totaled nearly $16 million.

Palin has long cast a shadow on the Republican field, though she has not declared her candidacy. Unless she announces she is not running, and maybe even after that, she will remain a factor.

[More]
Gov. Romney's 2008 presidential campaign acquired a reputation as a money-raising machine, but the fact that Gov. Palin's leadership PAC raised more money than his is significant. She has not yet even announced her candidacy, while Romney is an announced candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.

- JP

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Public Policy Polling: A tie at the top for Palin and Romney

Palin 16%, Romney 16%, Pawlenty 13%, Cain 12%
*
With Mitt Romney in New Hampshire to launch his presidential campaign and Sarah Palin's One Nation bus rolling into the Granite State to host a clambake for influential conservatives, the stage was perfectly set for Public Policy Polling to release the results of its latest national survey of GOP primary voters:
PPP's first national poll looking at the Republican Presidential race since Mike Huckabee and Donald Trump announced they wouldn't run finds Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin in a tie at the top with 16% each. Tim Pawlenty at 13% and Herman Cain at 12% are also in double digits with Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul each at 9%, and Jon Huntsman at 4% rounding out the field.

Romney's support is built on moderate and center right Republicans, while Palin's winning the most conservative faction of the party. With moderates Romney's at 26% with only Pawlenty at 15% also reaching double digits and Palin in third at 8%. With 'somewhat conservative' voters Romney likewise leads with 19% to 15% each for Pawlenty and Palin. But with voters identifying as 'very conservative' Romney finds himself well back in 5th place at 11% with Palin leading the way at 20%, followed by Cain at 15%, Bachmann at 13%, and Pawlenty at 12%.
The Democrat polling company's somewhat smallish sample is made up of 574 primary voters who usually cast their primary ballots for Republicans. The pollster, whose clients include radical leftist site Daily Kos and the SEIU, conducted automated telephone interviews from May 23rd to 25th.

h/t: Henry D'Andrea

- JP

RealClearPolitics: Palin Slams RomneyCare In Massachusetts

There will "obviously" be more explanation from Romney for his support of government mandates.
*
On the road with Sarah Palin's One Nation tour, Scott Conroy of RealClearPolitics reports that the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee criticized RomneyCare just minutes before the former Massachusetts governor who signed that bill into law formally announced his candidacy for president:
After noting that he would be a "great candidate," Palin quickly changed his tune when asked about Romney's record.

"I think that he'll have maybe a bit more challenges with independents who make up the tea party movement, wanting to make sure we are not going to--we won't have any excuses or perceived political reasons to grow government," Palin said. "In my opinion, any mandate coming from government is not a good thing, obviously, and I am not the only to say so. But obviously there will be more explanation coming from Gov. Romney for his support of government mandates."

Pressed on whether Romney would have a particularly difficult time attracting support from members of the tea party movement, Palin did not hold back.

"That perhaps will be a big challenge for him because tea party activists are pretty strident, in a good way, in making sure that the candidate that many of the tea party patriots will support--the candidate has a record of living out the principles that tea party patriots do embrace," she said.

Palin added that Romney may have a "good argument" that what he implemented in Massachusetts applied only on a statewide level and would not be appropriate nationally. But then she quickly went back on the attack.

"However, even on a state level and a local level, mandates coming from a governing body, it's tough for a lot of us to accept because we have great faith in the private sector and in our own families and in our businessmen and women in making decisions for ourselves," Palin said. "Not any level of government telling us what to do."

[More]
Conroy says that both candidates could benefit from the local media's Palin vs. Romney narrative because it draws attention away from other players in the crowded presidential field.

- JP

Monday, May 9, 2011

Whittington: Romney Supported by Elites, Palin by Working Class

"Palin is better positioned to garner votes than is Romney"
*
Mark Whittington analyzes the results of a recent Gallup poll which shows that support for former governors Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin are mirror images when broken down by income:
Support for Romney climbs with the income level of the American being asked, whereas it falls for Palin.

It might be tempting to ascribe this difference in support to personal styles and histories. Romney is well to do, practically to the manor born, with smooth manners, expensive clothes, and the history of being a successful CEO. Palin, on the other hand, is working class, self made, with a more natural, folksy manner about her. Romney would never be caught dead gutting halibut or dressing a newly killed caribou; he doubtless has people who will do that for him.

[...]

The Gallup Poll suggests Palin is better positioned to garner votes than is Romney. There are just more poor people than there are rich. That is one reason the Democrats, by conducting class warfare, have had some success.

Of course, concerning the class warfare strategy, one might conclude it would not be as effective against Palin than it would be against Romney. Palin may now be a relatively wealthy woman, but that money was earned and not inherited. Barack Obama's job as a "community organizer" is not going to go very well in a class war when matched up against a woman who worked in commercial fishing and as a sports reporter for a local TV station.

[More]
- JP

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Quote of the Day (April 16, 2011)

The best defense is a good offense
*
John Nolte via Twitter:
“While Romney's still trying to figure out how to explain RomneyCare, Palin's on offense dismantling Obama.
- JP

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Moderate Republicans prefer... Sarah Palin?

Who knew?
*
A new Gallup Poll finds Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney still statistically tied among Republicans who were asked which prospective presidential candidate they believe should be the party's 2012 nominee. But there are some surprises in the numbers when they are broken down among subgroups of Republicans:
Huckabee performs best among core Republicans, as opposed to conservative-leaning independent voters. He also performs best among Southerners, regular churchgoers and "non-supporters" of the tea party.

Surprisingly, Palin performs best among self-described "liberal or moderate" Republicans and those who "seldom" go to church. The poll also finds she has greater appeal to people who didn't graduate from college and with Republicans who make less than $90,000 a year. She ties with Romney on support from Republicans from the East Coast.

Meanwhile, Romney is most popular on the West Coast and leads Republicans who are 50 and over and wealthy. He has a significant lead when it comes to college graduates. He ties with Huckabee and bests Palin among GOPers who describe themselves as "tea party supporters."
But another surprise or two are in store when the results are broken down by the issues that are most important to Republicans:
Mitt Romney still does badly among those who social issues as the biggest issue in 2012, as does Newt Gingrich. Perhaps more surprising, Sarah Palin wins among those voters who see national security and foreign policy as the most important issue.

Interestingly, Gov. Palin ranked second on the economy and second on social issues, as well as first on security/foreign policy. Huckabee was preferred in two categories, rated second in another and third in the remaining one. Romney was first in one category, second in another and third in the remaining two. Gingrich finished third in one category and last in the other three. So when first and second place ratings are combined, Huckabee and Palin did well, Romney and Gingrich not so well. Such combinations become important when a candidate drops out and voters switch support to their second choices.

More good news for Gov. Palin: If she's doing this well this early with moderate GOPers, she won't have as much heavy lifting to do to improve her numbers among conservatives and tea partiers. We were told by the know-it-all punditocracy that the moderates would be hardest for her to bring over to her side. The media also mocked her foreign policy credentials, but she does better than her three most likely rivals among Republicans for whom it is their top issue. What Sarah Palin's team needs to do, if the results of this poll are to be taken seriously, is get the word out about her record as a fiscally responsible governor who cut her state's budgets and vetoed federal mandates with strings attached. The media has given short shrift to her fiscal accomplishments while governor of Alaska. This comes as no surprise, as even today, relatively few Americans are aware that National Journal magazine named Barack Obama and Joe Biden as two of the most liberal members of the U.S. Senate in 2007. The media didn't report that fact because it was in the sack with the Obama campaign to portray him as a centrist.

Which brings us to the grains of salt which should be taken with these poll results. Gallup sampled Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, not likely voters or even registered voters. Likely voters tend to be better informed on issues and candidates. Second grain of salt: Though the pundits are chomping at the bit for candidates to declare their intentions to run, it's still relatively early. Spring will be the season for that. And the final grain of salt: Recall the the polls of March, 2007, which assured us that Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton were certain to be the respective candidates of the two major political parties. Political perceptions can change, and rather quickly, too.

- JP

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Quote of the Day (February 12, 2011)

Via Twitter
*
Dan McLaughlin on Romney supporters at CPAC calling their man Mitt the anti-Palin:
"Well, Palin has principles."
- JP

Is Romney the Anti-Palin?

He's certainly no Reagan Conservative
*
That's what his supporters at CPAC are saying. We don't think so. Sarah Palin is the anti-Obama, so the anti-Palin spot is already occupied by default. But the contrasts between the two former governors could not be more sharply defined than by their relative positions on three key issues:

Abortion:
Romney says that his views on abortion have "evolved and deepened." He was for it before he was against it. His changing stances on the issue are chronicled here.

Sarah Palin has always opposed abortion. Period. As Deacon Keith Fournier wrote at Catholic Online in 2008, "Sarah Palin is a woman who lives what she proclaims. She is truly pro-life."
Second Amendment:
As on life issues, Romney's position on Second Amendment matters has evolved.

Sarah Palin has always been a strong defender of the Second Amendment. She is a lifetime NRA member who has been honored by that organization. As governor, she signed Alaska on to a multi-state amicus brief authored by the State of Texas in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller.
Reagan Conservatism:
Romney tried to distance himself from Ronald Reagan before he praised him. Byron York recalled the debate between Romney and Sen. Ted Kennedy during the 1994 Senate campaign: "In the debate, Kennedy tried to portray Romney as a turn-back-the-clock conservative, and Romney took exception, essentially disavowing Reagan." The former Massachusetts governor sings quite a different tune now.

Sarah Palin is a solid Reagan Conservative, and she has always been so. That's why the Young Americas Foundation chose her, above all others, to keynote the opening banquet of its recent Reagan 100 Celebration. Andrew Coffin, Vice President and Director of the Reagan Ranch Center, wrote of Gov. Palin on her visit to the ranch, "Everything about the Ranch reflects the great American, and, particularly, western ideals that Ronald Reagan cherished: hard work, responsibility, stewardship of the land, freedom, and opportunity. It was clear on Friday that Governor Palin is a leader cut from the same cloth—it is these great western ideals, and the way they could be seen at the Ranch in small but telling details, that she viscerally connected with. And I have to admit, it was fun to see up close how genuine that connection was."
In each of these three examples, the difference is consistency. Sarah Palin has been remarkably consistent and principled in her beliefs, whereas Mitt Romney seems to have modified his stance to appeal to different political constituencies. While it's somewhat encouraging to see him move away from the left on some key issues, we find the ease with which he has done it to be more than just a little opportunistic. We're reminded of the famous quote, first attributed to the famous Presbyterian minister (and twice Chaplain of the U.S. Senate) Peter Marshall, "You've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything."

Romney many not be the anti-Palin, but it's clear that he's no Ronald Reagan... nor is he in any way the Reagan conservative that Sarah Palin has proven herself to be.

- JP

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Quote of the Day (February 6, 2011)

Palin Rebukes Obama on Egypt Error
*
Free Us Florida:
"Unlike wishy-washy Romney, Sarah Palin has come out and rebuked Obama for his dithering over Egypt. As Palin pointed out, Israel is surrounded by snake and scorpion, each dedicated to its eradication."
- JP

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Mitt Romney: Sarah Palin would be a 'great' President

"Be careful what you say about her. She has a rifle, you know."
*
Although Mitt Romney claims that he hasn't made up his mind if he'll run for President in 2012, he says his wife is all for the idea and is urging him to throw his hat into the ring. The veteran of the 2008 race for the GOP nomination also says another former governor he knows would do a "great" job -- Sarah Palin:
During an interview on Tuesday night with Piers Morgan on CNN, the former GOP Massachusetts governor said Palin would bring a lot to the political table.

"I believe she is an extraordinarily powerful and effective voice in our party, that she has generated a great deal of support and attention, that she'd be great in a primary process," he said of the former vice-presidential nominee and Tea Party darling. "She'd bring attention to the process, and frankly, the more people we have on the stage in those debates talking about different ideas and different approaches, the better."

[...]

When the CNN host asked whether Romney could beat Palin, he replied, "I don't know the answer to that."
Romney has been making thge media rounds to promote his new book, No Apology: The Case for American Greatness.

- JP

Monday, January 31, 2011

Hotline: Gov. Palin outraises Mitt Romney, rivals at year's end

Governors Palin and Romney lap the field in the fundraising race
*
National Journal's Hotline On Call reports that Sarah Palin led all of her potential rivals for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination in end-of-the-year fundraising, even finishing ahead of her closest competitor Mitt Romney:
Both Palin and Romney filed impressive year-end fundraising reports, due Monday at the Federal Election Commission. From Nov. 23 and Dec. 31, Palin's Sarah PAC hauled in $279,000. She finished the year with $1.3 million in her campaign account.

Palin's total is particularly striking because she outraised Romney using only a federal political action committee. Romney's series of state level PACs set up in Alabama, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina, detailed in a New York Times report last year, allows big donors to max out both to Romney's federal committee, the Free and Strong America PAC, and to his state organizations, which often have higher contribution limits.

That state network helped Romney outraise Palin in the previous reporting period, which covered mid-October to the end of November. He wasn't as fortunate in the final reporting period of the year. In the last five weeks of 2010, Romney's federal PAC raised almost $175,000 and his state PACs hauled in $36,000, bringing his total haul to almost $211,000 -- less than Palin's take for the same period.

[More]
Hotline's Jeremy P. Jacobs says Gov. Palin's fundraising success shows that she has cultivated a dedicated network of contributors, most of them small donors. As for the other potential GOP candidates, none of their fundraising efforts even came close to those of the two front runners.

- JP

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Sarah's PAC ties Mitt's PAC in cash on hand

"She doesn't have to spend as much money on paid advertising"
*
Via ABC News:

Although Romney's raised more money last year, both PACs are sitting on about the same amount of cash...
Mitt Romney:
PAC: Free and Strong America PAC, Inc.
Total 2010 Receipts (from Oct. report): $4,614,790.08
Cash on Hand (from Oct. report): $1,341,906.13

Sarah Palin:
PAC: SarahPac
Total 2010 Receipts (from Oct. report): $2,501,652.04
Cash on Hand (from Oct. report): $1,277,433.92
h/t: Mitch Daniels fan Don Surber

- JP

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

PPP: Romney hurting in 8 states where Palin is strong with conservatives

"He has a major problem with conservatives..."
*
A survey of eight states by Democrat polling firm PPP reveals that Sarah Palin's favorability ratings with conservatives are higher than the other three most likely GOP presidential candidates in six of them, while she is the runner up in the remaining two. Gov. Palin is the leader in Ohio, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Montana and Virginia, and she's a strong second in Missouri and North Carolina. Her average favorability ratings across all eight states also leads the pack at 77 percent, followed by Mike Huckabee at 73 percent, Newt Gingrich with 64 percent and Mitt Romney at 58 percent.

Romney, though long promoted by the corrupt media as the leading Republican in the field for 2012, has been looking weaker and weaker in PPP's presidential recent polling, according to the company's blogger Tom Jensen. The reason for the former Massachusetts governor's increasing weakness, says Jensen, is that conservatives just don't view him favorably, and that's not likely to change:
We've polled eight states, not including Massachusetts, since the 2010 election ended. Romney has the lowest favorability rating of the Republican top 4 with conservatives in every single one of those states except Michigan, where he probably benefits from his dad having been the Governor. And it's not like Romney is just slightly less well liked than the others with conservatives- it's a large gap, particularly when you compare him with Palin or Huckabee.

[More]
Even in Michigan, where Gov. Romney makes his strongest showing with conservatives, he's third behind Governors Palin and Huckabee.

- JP

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Hillary Chabot: Sarah Palin circles around ol’ Mitt Romney

Can Mitt close the new media gap between him and our Sarah?
*
According to The Boston Herald's Hillary Chabot, Mitt Romney aims to try to emerge from the large shadow cast over him by "pop culture and new media megastar" Sarah Palin. The former Massachusetts governor hopes to "recapture the limelight" with a guest appearance on the “Tonight Show” with Jay Leno Tuesday night. But there is a difference of opinion among observers about the effectiveness of such a strategy:
Romney supporters said his first “Tonight Show” guest spot since his failed 2008 presidential bid was not inspired by the All-Sarah-All-the-Time coverage of his chief rival for the GOP nomination.

Palin has saturated the air waves — bludgeoning halibut on her Alaska reality show on TLC, cheering on daughter Bristol from a front-row seat on the ABC hit “Dancing with the Stars,” dishing politics on Fox News and flogging her second book on a coast-to-coast tour.

Spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said Romney has nothing to promote, and simply thought the Leno sit-down would be “fun.”

Others say a laid-back chat with Bay State native Leno will give the straight-arrow Romney a chance to let down his blow-dried hair in front of millions of late-night couch potatoes.

“He’s trying to make sure people don’t forget him,” said John Feehery, a Republican consultant based in Washington D.C. “He’s trying to humanize himself and appear sympathetic.”

GOP consultant and pollster Steve Lombardo advised Romney to avoid an all-out star war with a star of Palin’s magnitude.

“I think it would be a mistake for Romney to try to out-celebrity Sarah Palin. I don’t think anyone can do that right now,” Lombardo said. “He’ll probably never have the celebrity status or connect with the core Republican party like she does.”

[More]
Chabot says Romney has also been trying to close the social media gap between him and the 2008 vice presidential candidate. But he has a long way to go. Sarah Palin, she notes, has more than three times the number of Twitter followers and Facebook friends that Romney does. Blogging clinical law professor William A. Jacobson at Legal Insurrection tells Chabot that may be an insurmountable goal for Romney, opining “I don’t think anybody can catch her in terms of social media. She really has pioneered use of Facebook as primary means of communication with the public.”

- JP

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Why Mona Charen doesn't want Sarah Palin to run in 2012 (Updated)

Too smooth...
*
Syndicated columnist Mona Charen, lists several talking points as alleged reasons why she thinks that the 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate should not make a 2012 run for the White House. But she omitted what may be the real reason why Charen is so opposed to a Sarah Palin presidential candidacy:

Because in MonaWorld, Mitt Romney is "near perfection" as a candidate:
"You have to admire the near perfection of Mitt Romney as a candidate. It’s no easy thing to find someone with such poise, movie-star looks, high intelligence, family stability, and record of accomplishment. He is accused of being too smooth by those of us less gifted by nature."
Riiiight, Gov. Romney is such a perfect candidate that he couldn't even beat the weak John McCain in the 2008 GOP primaries, despite having raised over $90 million in campaign cash, $35 million of it from his own personal fortune.

h/t: Commenter John Galt at NRO


Update: According to Donald Douglas, Mona has jumped bandwagons. We have to assume that storied Romney near-perfection wasn't quite perfect enough. Now she's backing Mitch Daniels. Why, the Indiana governor must be even nearer to perfection than her former fave. Go figure...

- JP

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Poll: Gov. Palin has highest favorability with likely '12 GOP voters

*
Sarah Palin is rated highest in favorability among likely Republican voters for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination:
A Rasmussen Reports poll showed Palin with an 82 percent favorability rating, compared to 17 percent who view her unfavorably. Fifty percent of likely voters in the 2012 primary elections for the presidential nomination had a very favorable opinion of the former governor, while eight percent claimed they have a very unfavorable opinion of her.

Former Govs. Mitt Romney (R-Mass.) and Mike Huckabee (R-Ark.) trailed Palin with a favorability of 79 percent apiece. Seventeen percent hold unfavorable opinions of the two.

[...]

The three top contenders for the Republican nomination to challenge Obama in 2012 remain tied when likely primary voters were asked which candidate they would vote for if the primaries were held today.
Rasmussen surveyed 1,000 likely GOP primary voters with a margin of sampling error of plus-or-minus three percentage points.

- JP

Monday, November 1, 2010

Mitt Romney says a Palin presidential run would be 'great'

*
Though he wasn't hooked up to a polygraph at the time, The Hill quotes Mitt Romney as saying Monday it would be "great" for Sarah Palin to run for president in 2012:
"She would be a great thing for the Republican primary process," said Romney, a 2008 presidential candidate and a potential candidate again in 2012. "It'd be a good thing for her to get in."

Romney, Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) have all rallied around Palin, who on Sunday night condemned suggestions that GOP operatives in Washington were looking to stall any potential presidential aspirations she might have.

"The story is nonsense. Because first of all I know Sarah Palin pretty well, and if she wants to run there's not going to be any Washington elites stopping her," Romney told conservative talker Laura Ingraham on Monday on her radio show.

[...]

A spokesman for Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, another possible 2012 GOP presidential candidate, said Palin deserves credit and thanks for her work for the Republican Party.

"We're all on the same team, and anonymously sourced stories that try and divide us exemplify one reason why Americans outside the beltway hold D.C. in such contempt," said Alex Conant, the Pawlenty spokesman.

[...]

Palin is seen as a potential candidate in 2012, and she's started the process of opening the door to running in two years by saying she would enter the race if there were no other good candidates involved.

While Romney could be an opponent for the GOP nomination, it makes sense for he and others to support her now given Palin's power with grassroots conservative voters who will play a large role in determining the 2012 Republican nominee for president.
The story goes on cite a sham ABC News/Washington Post poll (which oversampled Democrats and independents, each by double digit percentages over Republicans) in an attempt to marginalize Gov. Palin. Stupid Media Tricks: a biased lamestream media outlet cites a poll cooked by other biased lamestream media outlets in a pitiful attempt to lend credibility to the narrative they are collectively trying to push. Sorry, guys and girls. That dog is too old and lame to hunt anymore.

- JP