What was a lamestream media morning show moron insinuating with her lead-in to a segment on how Sarah Palin is standing by a candidate she endorsed in the midst of unsupported allegations against the candidate? Was the mediot dissing the candidate, Gov. Palin, or both? Was she implying that there may be something to the allegations of adultery made against Nikki Haley, who is running for the GOP nomination for governor of South Carolina? Or by expressing shock that Sarah Palin, a champion of family values, would come to Haley's defense, was the lamestreamer insinuating that the governor herself is guilty of something salacious?
Bianna Golodryga, co-host of ABC's Good Morning America weekend edition, was obviously attempting to cast dispersion on Nikki Haley, Sarah Palin, or both women Sunday morning with her loaded tease of an upcoming segment. NewsBuster Mark Finkelstein reports and comments:
If Golodryga was not implying something about Nikki Haley, then she was clearly implying something about Gov. Palin. Her use of the innuendo here manages to smear both conservative women, which was probably the point all along. ABC is a smear machine. This is how our corrupt media operates -- with lies, distortion and innuendo. When Sarah Palin says you can't trust the lamestream media, she's right as rain.BIANNA GOLODRYGA: "If this political year has taught us anything, it's to expect the unexpected. Take the South Carolina governor's race for example. Allegations of extramarital affairs are flying against the leading GOP candidate there. And Sarah Palin of all people has rushed to her defense.""Of all people"? So Golodryga is ostensibly surprised by Palin's support of Haley. Why? Haley has categorically denied the allegations. By professing shock that family-values Palin would come to Haley's defense, it certainly sounds as if Bianna is implying there's substance to the accusations. If Golodryga's got proof, other than the allegations of men with possible political axes to grind, she should produce it. Otherwise, Golodryga should lay off the invidious insinuations.
Update: Golodryga, as it turns out, is White House OMB Director Peter Orszag’s fiancee, and she appears to already be playing for Team Obama. So her not-so-subtle little dig, it seems, was aimed at Gov. Palin.
h/t: Travis McGee
- JP
Bianna Golodryga, now there's a household name! Never heard of her until now. Isn't it funny how nobodies can get major attention by smearing Palin? Even has beens like Henry Winkler, get to grab some of the limelight by doing the same thing.
ReplyDeleteThe irony of this is astounding.
ReplyDeleteFrom WaPo: "Peter Orszag runs wild"
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/achenblog/2010/01/peter_orszag_runs_wild.html
"Peter Orszag, the director of the Office of Management and Budget -- the man charged with the unenviable, arguably impossible job of making President Obama's budget numbers line up -- has a personal life with its own set of management challenges that would drive most people to bankruptcy, and perhaps even to insanity.
He's divorced with two young kids. He and his ex-wife share custody.
The 40-year-old Orszag had a "committed relationship" with a hottie heiress, Claire Milonas, 39, last year that proved not to be so committed after all -- he ran off with a different hottie, 31-year-old journalist Bianna Golodryga, who he met at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. They're getting married.
But wait! The jilted heiress turns out to have been carrying her own unfunded mandate. She delivered the baby girl in November. Following the disclosure of the "love child" by the New York Post, Orszag and Milonas on Wednesday issued a joint statement acknowledging the birth and asking, Tiger-like, for "privacy."
We certainly believe here in the A-blog that even public figures deserve a certain amount of privacy. But frankly I don't see how Orszag can balance three families AND the national budget."